ELISA Scientific Calculator
A scientific ELISA analytical tool: 4PL/5PL standard curve fitting from replicate-mean calibrators, replicate CV with sample SD, dilution-corrected provisional concentration estimates, standard back-calculation review, and an optional ICH M10 LBA calibrator profile. Beta · Scientific audit in progress.
Input & Computation
Standard Curve
| Conc. | OD Rep 1 | OD Rep 2 | OD Rep 3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Samples
| Label | OD Rep 1 | OD Rep 2 | OD Rep 3 | Dil. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Plate Layout (optional)
Evidence & References
Engvall E & Perlmann P (1971)
Original ELISA paper. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8(9):871–874.
Findlay JWA & Dillard RF (2007)
Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays. AAPS J 9(2):E260–E267. Establishes 4PL as the standard model for immunoassays.
ICH M10 (2022)
Bioanalytical method validation guideline. The ICH M10 LBA calibrator profile (±20% internal, ±25% lowest/highest calibrators, ≥75% of levels accepted, ≥6 levels) is applied here as an optional review, not as evidence of run validity.
Boulanger B et al. (2003)
An analysis of the ELISA and immunoassay validation parameters. J Pharm Biomed Anal 32(4–5):753–765. Defines acceptance criteria for back-calculated standards (±15%).
Broto M et al. (2019)
New perspectives in immunoassay quality control. Anal Bioanal Chem 411:7503–7514. Sigma metrics application to ELISA assay monitoring.
ECIS v2.0 beta architecture: replicate-mean calibrator points → 4PL/5PL/linear/loglog Levenberg-Marquardt fitting with convergence and domain guards → calibrator back-calculation from the same replicate means → optional ICH M10 LBA calibrator profile → replicate CV (sample SD, Grubbs outlier detection) → provisional dilution-corrected sample estimates. Status: Beta · Scientific audit in progress.
PM Lab Suite
Clinical Laboratory Intelligence Platform
When to Use
- Fitting 4PL/5PL ELISA standard curves from replicate-mean calibrators
- Computing replicate CV with the sample standard deviation (n−1)
- Back-calculating calibrator accuracy from the same replicate means used for fitting
- Reviewing concentration estimates against an optional ICH M10 LBA calibrator profile
- Teaching ELISA analytical concepts with viva preparation
Common Pitfalls
- Treating entered calibrator endpoints as validated LLOQ/ULOQ (method-validation evidence is required)
- Accepting R² alone as proof of calibration acceptability
- Assuming a hook effect is excluded because no decline is visible within entered standards
- Using within-run duplicate CV as a method CV in sigma metrics
- Failing to correct for dilution factor in sample back-calculation
