Welcome to

Dr. Prasenjit Mitra

Dr. Prasenjit Mitra

Associate Professor · PGIMER Chandigarh

PregaMind EV-OMICS

PregaMind EV-OMICS

Extracellular Vesicles · Brain · Maternal Health

PreciMind Intelligence

PreciMind Intelligence

Clinical Reasoning · Diagnostics · Frameworks

PM Lab Suite

PM Lab Suite

Precision Tools · Quality Analytics

Extracellular Vesicles · Clinical Intelligence · Precision Medicine

PM LabSuite
ELISA Intelligence System
HomePM Lab SuiteELISA Intelligence System
PM Lab Suite·Core Lab Tools

ELISA Intelligence System

A cognitive ELISA analytical platform integrating 4PL/5PL curve fitting, curve reliability scoring, sample validation, assay performance characterisation, sigma metrics, and clinical interpretation narrative.

Core Lab Tools provide rapid calculations and can be extended into full Clinical Intelligence Systems.

Input
Compute
Output
Interpret
Evidence

Input & Computation

Layer 1 + 2
Curve Model

Standard Curve

Conc.OD Rep 1OD Rep 2OD Rep 3

Samples

LabelOD Rep 1OD Rep 2OD Rep 3Dil.

Plate Layout (optional)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
Click to assign well types. Used for plate heatmap visualization in Analysis tab.

Evidence & References

Layer 5
1

Engvall E & Perlmann P (1971)

Original ELISA paper. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry 8(9):871–874.

2

Findlay JWA & Dillard RF (2007)

Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays. AAPS J 9(2):E260–E267. Establishes 4PL as the standard model for immunoassays.

3

CLSI EP17-A2 (2012)

Evaluation of Detection Capability for Clinical Laboratory Measurement Procedures. Defines LLOQ, ULOQ, LoD, and LoB for quantitative assays.

4

Boulanger B et al. (2003)

An analysis of the ELISA and immunoassay validation parameters. J Pharm Biomed Anal 32(4–5):753–765. Defines acceptance criteria for back-calculated standards (±15%).

5

Broto M et al. (2019)

New perspectives in immunoassay quality control. Anal Bioanal Chem 411:7503–7514. Sigma metrics application to ELISA assay monitoring.

6

Sittampalam GS et al. (2004)

Recommendations for the design, optimization, and qualification of cell-based assays used for the detection of neutralizing antibody responses elicited by biological therapeutics. J Immunol Methods 289:1–16.

ECIS v1.0 architecture: 4PL/5PL Levenberg-Marquardt fitting → back-calculation recovery (±15% = PASS, ±20% = FAIL) → sample quantification with dilution correction → LLOQ/ULOQ range checking → replicate CV assessment (Grubbs outlier detection) → sigma metrics integration → interpretive narrative generation.

PM Lab Suite

Clinical Laboratory Intelligence Platform

InputStructured inputs & validation
ComputeValidated formulas
OutputCritical value highlighting
InterpretClinical/lab relevance
EvidenceGuideline references

When to Use

  • Evaluating ELISA assay reliability beyond R²
  • Validating samples within or outside calibration range
  • Characterising assay performance: LLOQ, ULOQ, dynamic range, signal-to-noise
  • Applying sigma metrics to ELISA performance assessment
  • Generating clinical interpretation narratives for biomarker data
  • Teaching ELISA analytical concepts with viva preparation

Common Pitfalls

  • Reporting concentrations from extrapolated OD values (outside LLOQ–ULOQ)
  • Accepting R² ≥ 0.98 without checking standard back-calculation errors
  • Ignoring hook effect at high concentrations
  • Using CV% without clinical context of the biomarker
  • Failing to correct for dilution factor in sample back-calculation